|
|
|
 |
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Bantam

|
I wonder how they came up with that. It looked like Len thought they should be split. Fangers would you really want only 3 other teams in your divison?? I realize the driving sucks but I would think having only 3-4 other teams in your division would be worse. But that is only MY opinion of course. What will be your farthest drive?
Y.H.F. Commissioner
|
| |
|
Pee Wee

|
Drive has nothing to do with it. Only having to play 12 league games - as compared to 24 now - would have opened up more dates for tourneys & other non-league games. I don't see much competition within the league...just my opinion... And now it means all the Cincy teams have to play one another. It's not so much an issue with Major vs. Minor because those are birth year based teams. But the 3rd team is 90/91 combined, which opens up a can of worms for parents - and they are there - who felt little johnnie should have made the top birth year team. Potentially a thorny situation....
'90 Goalie Dad
|
| |
| Posts: 728 | Location: Greater Cincinnati | Registered: June 16, 2004 |  
IP
|
|
Mini Mite
|
quote: Originally posted by TROLL: Bluegrass: Dayton Bluehawks Cincy Cyclones - 2 Indy Checkers - 2 Evansville Thunder Arctic Blast
Hoosier: Cincy Cyclones - 1 Indy Checkers - 1 CCYHA Blue Jackets Cardinal Columbus 95
Bluehawks win Tournament, although top to bottom, Hoosier is a much tougher and deeper conference.
Write it down.
Hmmmm. With realignment, dropouts and pickups the above needs to be tweeked, however, early season polling and returns suggest I am dead on. Here are the revisions with the changes to teams: Bluegrass: Dayton Bluehawks (too easy) Indy Checkers 2 (controversial pick over Indy 1 -- all but one second year players) Cincy 95 (middle three should have great games) Indy Checkers 1 (four 94s may push them above Cincy) Evansville (the Boise State of BTHL Sq.) Hoosier: Cincy 94 (again, too easy) CCYHA 94 (only team with all second year players, should be good, but unknown) Cardinal (could surprise teams, good goaltending and hung with Bluehawks) Cols. 95 (young team, long year) Findlay Select (unknown, but name does not instill confidence)
|
| |
| Posts: 99 | Location: Hockeytown | Registered: August 16, 2004 |  
IP
|
|
Mite

|
quote: Originally posted by TROLL: .
Hmmmm. With realignment, dropouts and pickups the above needs to be tweeked, however, early season polling and returns suggest I am dead on. Here are the revisions with the changes to teams: Bluegrass: Dayton Bluehawks (too easy) Indy Checkers 2 (controversial pick over Indy 1 -- all but one second year players) Cincy 95 (middle three should have great games) Indy Checkers 1 (four 94s may push them above Cincy) Evansville (the Boise State of BTHL Sq.) Hoosier: Cincy 94 (again, too easy) CCYHA 94 (only team with all second year players, should be good, but unknown) Cardinal (could surprise teams, good goaltending and hung with Bluehawks) Cols. 95 (young team, long year) Findlay Select (unknown, but name does not instill confidence)[/QUOTE] Looks like a month later you are very close. I wonder if this would have been a good year to start a AA gold AA Silver divisons for beter competition. Looks like close games between the top teams and between the middle teams, but when the top play the bottom nothing good comes from it.
|
| |
| Posts: 131 | Location: In the Net | Registered: June 25, 2004 |  
IP
|
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
|
 
|